KENNEL CLUB HAILS CHANGES TO DANGEROUS DOGS LEGISLATION IN SCOTLAND ‘A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION’
The Kennel Club has
today broadly welcomed a consultation issued by Alex Neil MSP seeking
to introduce a ‘Control of Dogs Bill’, which would strengthen the
Dangerous Dogs Act in Scotland.
The Kennel Club has
been advising Mr Neil MSP in drafting his Control of Dogs Bill, which
is to be introduced as a Members Bill. If passed the Bill would
introduce 3 changes to current legislation relating to dangerous dogs:
- Instead
of applying only to attacks that take place in public, the Bill would
also make attacks on private property a criminal offence; - The introduction of ‘control orders’ would apply to all types of dog that have acted dangerously without provocation;
- The microchipping of dogs that had transgressed, whose owners had been issued with a control order, would be compulsory.
Providing the
appropriate defences are put into place, the Kennel Club believes that
introducing streamlined ‘control orders’, for example to order
irresponsible dog owners to keep their
dogs subject to conditions including being kept on a lead and/or
muzzled or in severe cases, disqualify irresponsible dog owners from
owning animals, will better protect the public and thus the welfare of dogs.
However, the Kennel
Club wanted the Bill to go further and fully reflect its position of
‘deed not breed’ by making significant changes to Section 1 of the
Dangerous Dogs Act which would have ultimately repealed it.
Although the Kennel
Club understands that it would not be practical in the current
political climate to remove the list of banned breeds from Section 1 of
the current Act, we do believe that the amnesty in Liverpool following
the tragic death of Ellie Lawrenson last year proved even further the
need to re-open the Index of Exempted Dogs (IED) to owner led
applications. This would allow responsible owners of illegal dogs to
register their dogs (providing their dogs were deemed safe, and met the
registration requirements), and for the police to focus their
activities on non registered pit bull terrier type dogs e.g. those that
are likely to be owned by irresponsible dog owners.
Said Caroline Kisko:
“We very much welcome Alex Neil’s Members Bill as a step in the right
direction to making dangerous dogs legislation more effective. However,
it is a shame that the proposals contained in the Bill have not gone so
far as to change the highly flawed Section 1 of the Dangerous Dogs Act
and recognise that certain types of dogs are not inherently dangerous
or that the actions of dog owners and a dog’s training have more of an
impact on dogs’ behaviour than breed”.
15th January 2008
[005.08]
For further press information,
- Log in to post comments